Comments on: Top 10 Tips To Get Good Deals in Short Sales and Bank Owned Property http://www.CrystalClearMarket.com/2008/05/12/top-10-tips-to-get-good-deals-in-short-sales-and-bank-owned-property/ Real Estate Insights on selling, buying, investing, foreclosures much more. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:13:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: brian http://www.CrystalClearMarket.com/2008/05/12/top-10-tips-to-get-good-deals-in-short-sales-and-bank-owned-property/comment-page-1/#comment-109 brian Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:01:29 +0000 http://www.CrystalClearMarket.com/?p=181#comment-109 I think you are missing his point. He's saying that Investor B would have passed on other deals because it wasn't as good as his first deal. No doubt his first deal was great, but it ended there. It's not a math problem it is a perception problem. Investor A wins because he could see other deals that Investor B could not. I think you are missing his point. He’s saying that Investor B would have passed on other deals because it wasn’t as good as his first deal.

No doubt his first deal was great, but it ended there.

It’s not a math problem it is a perception problem. Investor A wins because he could see other deals that Investor B could not.

]]> By: Tim http://www.CrystalClearMarket.com/2008/05/12/top-10-tips-to-get-good-deals-in-short-sales-and-bank-owned-property/comment-page-1/#comment-108 Tim Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:51:46 +0000 http://www.CrystalClearMarket.com/?p=181#comment-108 You need to compare apples to apples here - your math is total garbage. Assuming your basic math is right: Investor A had an equity increase of $52681 per house. Investor B had an equity increase of $77628 per house. Who had the better investment? Again - assuming both had the same amount of capital to invest - Investor B would also have had another $625,000 to invest somewhere else - and more than likely would have made better investment choices than Investor A there as well. You need to compare apples to apples here – your math is total garbage.

Assuming your basic math is right:
Investor A had an equity increase of $52681 per house.
Investor B had an equity increase of $77628 per house.
Who had the better investment?

Again – assuming both had the same amount of capital to invest – Investor B would also have had another $625,000 to invest somewhere else – and more than likely would have made better investment choices than Investor A there as well.

]]>